| Abbreviated Journal Title | ISSN | 2008 | Impact | 5-Year | 2008 |
| Total Cites | Factor | Impact | Articles | ||
| Factor | |||||
| NAT REV MOL CELL BIO | 1471-0072 | 19628 | 35.423 | 34.221 | 84 |
| NATURE | 0028-0836 | 443967 | 31.434 | 31.21 | 899 |
| CELL | 0092-8674 | 142064 | 31.253 | 30.149 | 348 |
| SCIENCE | 0036-8075 | 409290 | 28.103 | 30.268 | 862 |
| NAT MATER | 1476-1122 | 18902 | 23.132 | 25.759 | 129 |
| NAT BIOTECHNOL | 1087-0156 | 28188 | 22.297 | 25.329 | 100 |
| NAT CELL BIOL | 1465-7392 | 22676 | 17.774 | 17.637 | 145 |
| NAT METHODS | 1548-7091 | 5956 | 13.651 | 15.011 | 118 |
| DEV CELL | 1534-5807 | 12421 | 12.882 | 13.284 | 149 |
| PLOS BIOL | 1544-9173 | 12186 | 12.683 | 14.662 | 212 |
| ANNU REV BIOMED ENG | 1523-9829 | 2122 | 10.789 | 13.679 | 15 |
| P NATL ACAD SCI USA | 0027-8424 | 416018 | 9.38 | 10.228 | 3508 |
| ANNU REV FLUID MECH | 0066-4189 | 5239 | 9.314 | 13.306 | 17 |
| ADV MATER | 0935-9648 | 49008 | 8.191 | 10.231 | 772 |
| PHYS REV LETT | 0031-9007 | 310717 | 7.18 | 7.134 | 3905 |
| DEVELOPMENT | 0950-1991 | 46547 | 6.812 | 7.218 | 390 |
| BIOMATERIALS | 0142-9612 | 39782 | 6.646 | 7.325 | 511 |
| SMALL | 1613-6810 | 5016 | 6.525 | 7.292 | 319 |
| LAB CHIP | 1473-0197 | 6369 | 6.478 | 7 | 279 |
| ANAL CHEM | 0003-2700 | 77792 | 5.712 | 5.918 | 1221 |
| LANGMUIR | 0743-7463 | 76864 | 4.097 | 4.347 | 2026 |
| APPL PHYS LETT | 0003-6951 | 179925 | 3.726 | 4.096 | 5449 |
| MICROFLUID NANOFLUID | 1613-4982 | 783 | 3.314 | 4.194 | 133 |
| IEEE CONTR SYST MAG | 1066-033X | 2245 | 2.827 | 2.731 | 34 |
| J FLUID MECH | 0022-1120 | 30950 | 2.315 | 2.714 | 450 |
| IEEE T CONTR SYST T | 1063-6536 | 3114 | 2.13 | 2.566 | 132 |
| SIAM J CONTROL OPTIM | 0363-0129 | 4356 | 1.517 | 1.77 | 132 |
2008 RANKINGS FOR UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS
| 1. Massachusetts Inst. of Technology 4.9 | 1- MIT | Johns Hopkins University (Whiting) (MD) |
| 2. Stanford University (CA) 4.7 | 2-Stanford | Georgia Institute of Technology |
| 2. University of California–Berkeley * 4.7 | 3-University of Michigan | University of California–San Diego (Jacobs) |
| 4. California Institute of Technology 4.6 | 4-University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign | University of Washington |
| 5. Georgia Institute of Technology * 4.5 | 5-University of California- Berkeley | Duke University (NC) |
| 5. U. of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign * 4.5 | 6-California Institute of Technology | Boston University |
| 7. Cornell University (NY) 4.4 | 7-Princeton University | University of Pennsylvania |
| 7. University of Michigan–Ann Arbor * 4.4 | 8- Cornell | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
| 9. Carnegie Mellon University (PA) 4.2 | 9-University of Texas at Austin | Rice University (Brown) (TX) |
| 9. Purdue Univ.–West Lafayette (IN)* 4.2 | 10- University of Minnesota | Case Western Reserve University (OH) |
| 9. University of Texas–Austin * 4.2 | 11-University of California-San Diego | University of Michigan–Ann Arbor |
| 12. Princeton University (NJ) 4.1 | 12-Penn State | Northwestern University (McCormick) (IL) |
| 13. Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison * 4.0 | 13- Northwestern | Stanford University (CA) |
| 14. Johns Hopkins University (MD) 3.9 | 14-Georgia Institute of Technology | University of California–Berkeley † |
| 14. Northwestern University (IL) 3.9 | 15-University of California- LA | Washington University in St. Louis (Sever) |
| 14. Virginia Tech * 3.9 | 16-Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst | University of Pittsburgh |
| 17. Pennsylvania State U.–University Park * 3.8 | 17- Texas A&M | University of Virginia |
| 17. Rice University (TX) 3.8 | 18-Purdue University | University of Texas–Austin |
| 17. Texas A&M Univ.–College Station * 3.8 | 19-Carnegie Mellon | Columbia University (Fu Foundation) (NY) |
| 20. Columbia University (NY) 3.7 | 20-Brown | University of Utah |
| 20. Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst. (NY) 3.7 | 21-Virginia Polytech Inst & State University | Vanderbilt University (TN) |
| 20. Univ. of California–Los Angeles * 3.7 | 22-North Carolina State University | California Institute of Technology |
| 20. Univ. of Minnesota–Twin Cities * 3.7 | 23-University of Wisconsin- Madison | University of Wisconsin–Madison |
| 20. University of Washington * 3.7 | 24-University of Pennsylvania | Carnegie Mellon University (PA) |
| 25. Duke University (NC) 3.6 | 25-Ohio State University | Cornell University (NY) |
| 25. Ohio State University–Columbus * 3.6 | 26-Case Western Reserve University | Purdue University–West Lafayette (IN) |
| 25. Univ. of California–San Diego * 3.6 | 27-University of California-Davis | University of California–Davis |
| 25. Univ. of Maryland–College Park * 3.6 | 28-Columbia University | University of Minnesota–Twin Cities |
| 29. North Carolina State U.–Raleigh * 3.5 | 29-Lehigh University | Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (NY) |
| 29. University of Florida * 3.5 | 30- Michigan State University | Arizona State University (Fulton) |
| 29. University of Pennsylvania 3.5 | 31- Rice | Pennsylvania State University–University Park |
| 29. Univ. of Southern California 3.5 | 32-University of Arizona | Texas A&M University–College Station (Look) |
| 33. Harvard University (MA) 3.4 | 33-University of Maryland College Park | University of Southern California (Viterbi) |
| 33. University of California–Davis * 3.4 | 34-University of Washington | CUNY–City College (Grove) |
| 33. University of Colorado–Boulder * 3.4 | 35-University of Southern California | North Carolina State University |
| 33. University of Virginia * 3.4 | 36- University of Notre Dame | University of Iowa |
| 37. Arizona State University * 3.3 | 37-Rutgers State University- New Brunswick | Drexel University (PA) |
| 37. Case Western Reserve Univ. (OH) 3.3 | 28-Oklahoma State University | Harvard University (MA) |
| 37. Iowa State University * 3.3 | 39-University of Delaware | Marquette University (WI) |
| 37. Lehigh University (PA) 3.3 | 40-Duke | Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey–New Brunswick |
| 37. Univ. of California–Santa Barbara * 3.3 | 41-Johns Hopkins University | SUNY–Stony Brook |
| 37. Yale University (CT) 3.3 | 42-Cuny | University of Alabama–Birmingham |
| 43. Brown University (RI) 3.2 | 43-University of California-Irvine | University of California–Irvine (Samueli) |
| 43. Michigan State University * 3.2 | 44-Clemson University | University of Rochester (NY) |
| 43. University of Notre Dame (IN) 3.2 | 45-State University of New York-Buffalo | Yale University (CT) |
| 43. Vanderbilt University (TN) 3.2 | 46-University of Cincinnati | Brown University (RI) |
| 48. Dartmouth College (NH) 3.1 | 47-University of Utah | Clemson University (SC) |
| 48. University of California–Irvine * 3.1 | 48-University of Iowa | University of California–Los Angeles (Samueli) |
| 49-University of Virginia | University of Arizona | |
| 50-University of Colorado |
BACKUP of MY sites...July 2009
I am a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA. I am advised by Professor Philip R. LeDuc and Professor William C. Messner. I have been working with Professor Lance A. Davidson in the Department of Bioengineering at University of Pittsburgh.
My research has been focusing on Closed-Loop Microfluidic Controls for Cellular Dynamics in Xenopus laevis Embryonic Development. The developing system is based on the control of the laminar flow interface in a microfluidic channel that allows the precise manipulation of the subcellular chemical environments and automated measurements of cellular responses without destruction of cells for long periods of time. This is critical for investigating cell responses in cancer metastasis, embryogenesis, and differentiation, which are often on the order of hours to days.
- Development and instrumentation of the new microfluidic technology with dynamic system and control theory
- Design and optimization of the new microfluidic device scaling up to milifluidic network for in-vitro tissue environment
- Using this technology to understand the dynamics of cellular and molecular mechanisms in particularly long-term biological systems including identification of cell motility features in cancer metastasis, and cellular signal pathway and gene expression in Xenopus laevisembryogenesis
Education and Professional Experience (Further Information : Read Research Experience)
Journal Publications
|
Y. Kim, W. C. Messner,
and P. R. LeDuc,
"Three-Dimensional Profile
Inversion with Two-Dimensional
Fluidic Modules and Autonomous
Flow Control at Micrometer to
Millimeter Scales", Submitted.
C.-M. Cheng, Y.
Kim, J. M. Yang, S. H.
Leuba, and P. R. LeDuc,
"Dynamics of Individual Polymers
using Microfluidic based
microCurvilinear Flow", Lab
Chip, 2009 online
DOI:10.1039/b907860f. (Link)
Y. Kim, B.
Kuczenski, P. R. LeDuc, and W.
C. Messner, “Modulation of
Fluidic Resistance and
Capacitance for Long-Term
High-Speed Feedback Control of a
Microfluidic Interface”, Lab
Chip, 2009 online
DOI:10.1039/b822423d. (Link)
Y. Kim, S. Pae,
and K. Min, “Combustion Modeling
for Stratified Charge”, Journal
of Korean Society of Automotive
Engineers, VOL 9-4,
50-55, 2001.
|
Conference Proceedings
|
Y. Kim,
S. D. Joshi, L. A.
Davidson, W. C. Messner,
and P. R. LeDuc,
"Probing Spatiotemporal
Dynamics in the
Integrated
Multi-Cellular
Environment of Xenopus
laevis: Embryonic
Development Regulated
through a Microfluidic
Feedback Approach", Annual
Fall Meeting of
Biomedical Engineering
Society, 2009. Poster
Presentation.
Y. Kim, B. Kuczenski, W. C. Messner, and P. R. LeDuc, "Feedback Approach for Controlling Fluid Interfaces to Probe Cell Responses with Microfluidics", Annual Fall Meeting of BioMedical Engineering Society, 2008. Poster Presentation. Y. Kim, B. Kuczenski, P. R. LeDuc, and W. C. Messner, "Pressure Modulation using Fluidic Resistance and Capacitance for Fluid Interface Control in Microfluidic Networks", International Conference of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 2008. Podium Presentation.
Y. Kim,
J. Lee, and J. Joo,
"Reduction of Radiated
Noise in a Reciprocating
Compressor",Conference
of Korean Society of
Noise and Vibration
Engineers,
2005. Podium
Presentation.
J. Joo, J. Lee, J. Jeong, and Y. Kim, "Development of the Ultra-Silence Refrigerator with Considering Consumer's Hearing", Conference of Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineers, 2005. J. Kang, J. Jeong, and Y. Kim, "Dynamic Analysis of an Inverter Motor Driven Compressor",Conference of Korean Society of Noise and Vibration Engineers, 2004.
H. Choi, Y.
Kim, and K.
Min, "Combustion
Modeling for Stratified
Charge in GDI Engines", Conference
of Korean Society of
Automotive Engineers,
2003.
Y. Kim, Y. Kim, O. Ahn and Y. Kang, "Reduction Method of Structural Noise Radiated by Dash Panel of a Passenger Car", Conference of Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, 2002. Podium Presentation. S. Pae, Y. Kim, J. Lim, and K. Min, "Laminar Flame Velocity of Propane and Isooctane Fuel for Stratified Combustion Modeling", Conference of Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. |
References
|
Professor Philip R.
LeDuc (PhD thesis
advisor)
Department of Mechanical
Engineering with a
courtesy appointment in
the Departments of
Biomedical Engineering
and Biological Sciences
Carnegie Mellon
University, Pittsburgh,
PA 15213
412-268-2504
Professor William C.
Messner (PhD thesis
advisor)
Department of Mechanical
Engineering with a
courtesy appointment in
the Department
of Electrical and
Computer Engineering
Carnegie Mellon
University, Pittsburgh,
PA 15213
412-268-2510
Professor Lance A.
Davidson (PhD thesis
commitee member)
Department of
Bioengineering
University of
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh,
PA 15260
412-383-5820
Professor Kenji
Shimada (instructor
for whom I served as
TA)
Department of
Mechanical
Engineering with a
courtesy appointment
in the Departments
of Biomedical and
Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, and the
Robotics institutes
Carnegie Mellon
University,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-3614
Professor KyoungDoug Min (MS
thesis advisor)
Department of Mechanical
and Aerospace
Engineering
Seoul National
University, Seoul, South
Korea
+82-2-880-1661
|
Research Experience
|
Aug. 2007. ~ Present
Dec. 2003. ~ Apr. 2007.
Jan. 2001. ~ Nov. 2003.
Jan. 1999. ~ Jan. 2001.
|
Awards and Honors
|
2008 ~ 2009
2007 ~ 2008
2002
1999 ~ 2000
|
Teaching Experience
|
Patents
|
Wall-following robot cleaner and method to control the same
Robot cleaner with improved dust collector
Robot cleaner system having robot cleaner and docking station
Robot cleaner system and method of controlling the same
Apparatus of monitoring rear of vehicle
Ten patents in the Korean Patent Office
|
Cell Fluorescent Imaging
|
Making Ringer's Solution Ringer's Solution is a pH-balanced salt solution that is used for live cell imaging. From Gerbino, Ruder et al., J Cell Biol. 171 (2), 2005: link to jcb.org
"Ringer's solution containing 121 mM NaCl, 2.4 mM K2HPO4, 0.4 mM KH2PO4, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 10 mM Hepes/NaOH, pH 7.40."
Making 10X StockWarren generally maintains a bottle of ultra-precise 10x Ringer's stock solution which includes:
1.21 M NaCl (for 500 mL of solution, use 35.3562 g)
Making 1X Solution500 mL batch You need:
Clean Glassware
pH meter and pH titrating solutions (generally NaOH at 10 M, 1 M, 0.1 M)
Mixing the solution
Balancing the pH
Final Dilution
Pour the contents of the precision flask into the container. Do not rinse the remnants into the container with DI water- this will cause further dilution, which is not desired.
Clean up your
glassware.
Imaging Dye Loaded Cells
Finally, turn on the lambda 10.3 controller and choose appropriate shutter setting (see UsingShutterController). The following is a list of live cell dyes used in the Leduc laboratory and good approaches for their use: Fluo-4-AM
This protocol describes use of the Lambda 10-3 controller and computer-controlled Smart Shutter. Unless specifically noted, "shutter" refers to the Smart Shutter, and not the built-in Zeiss shutter. Before beginning, make sure that the manual (Zeiss) shutter is open. Also, make sure that the fluorescent lamp is already on. You must always turn the shutter controller on after the mercury lamp and turn it off before you turn off the mecury lamp. Turning on the mecury arc lamp power supply produces a surge that can damage the electronics of the shutter controller To Enable the Controller for Cell Imaging/Movie Making:
On the keypad at the right select LOCAL to enable keypad functionality The shutter is now controlled by a TTL pulse from the camera controller card. This allows synchronization of image capture by camera and excitation by lamp To Disable Controller
Select MODE. The shutter is now in manual mode.
* Press S1 on the keypad until the shutter opens. Ensure the Mercury Arc Light is transmitted through the microscope housing and into the filterblock changer. Turn off the device with the off/ on switch. Make sure to leave the shutter open for the next user. This will allow users not familiar with the Lambda Smart Shutter to revert back to the built-in Zeiss shutter. |
Microfluidics
|
Microfluidics Toolbox A list of parts and tools we should have readily available to make microfluidic devices.
Notes for preparing microfluidic devices for Calcium experiments
|
Microscopy
|
How to use the 63X Objective CAREFULLY
Microscope Protocol-LeDuc Lab Inserting the Objective (to eliminate objective damage) 1. We will be putting this in a lock-box with personal codes in the future, but we do not have this yet. People need to use this so we are proceeding while we order this box. For now, sign the objective out and remove it from the objective drawer located in the main lab computer desk (not the imaging computer desk). 2. Remove the microscope shroud. 3. Place Styrofoam bucket next to the microscope stage (THIS IS TO PROTECT THE OBJECTIVE IN CASE IT FALLS). 4. Position the 63X objective turret hole to the center turret position. The 63X turret hole is the only hole with a small Wollaston prism underneath it that can be manually adjusted with a thumbscrew. YOU MUST USE THIS HOLE FOR THE 63X. (Hole #1). The 10X Objective should be in Hole #2 and the 20X Objective should be in Hole #6) 5. Uncap the turret hole (MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT ANY TURRET HOLE IS UNCOVERED AS DUST CAN GET INTO THE HOLE WHICH CAN PERMANENTLY APPEAR ON EVERYONE’S IMAGES IN THE FUTURE). 6. Perform steps 6-11 over the Styrofoam bucket. 7. Unscrew the objective case cap from the objective case – OVER THE STYROFOAM BUCKET. NOTE: Be careful as there is no guarantee that the previous user screwed the objective into the objective case cap. 8. Make sure the objective is securely screwed into the objective holder cap. 9. Using a COTTON TIP APPLICATOR (LIKE A Q-TIP) AND NOT KIM WIPES (WHICH CAN SCRATCH THE OBJECTIVE) to wipe the excessive oil from the objective so that it is not slippery. 10. Inspect the objective for damage. FOR THE CURRENT DEMO LENS, a small indentation has already been formed at the point where damage occurs. You must ensure that this indentation does not become worse. We will take images so that you will have a comparison point for this. Please inform Phil immediately if you see anything. 11. Unscrew the objective from the objective cap. 12. Align the base of the 63X objective with the microscope turret hole (Hole #1, which is marked “1” on the microscope turret) 13. Gently screw the objective into the turret. Be EXTREMELY CAREFUL not to cross-thread the objective and turret. This will result in irreparable damage of many thousands of dollars. IF IT IS NOT SCREWING IN, DO NOT FORCE IT….UNSCREW IT AND TRY TO SCREW IT BACK IN. IF IT CONTINUES TO NOT WORK, STOP YOUR WORK AND TALK TO PHIL ABOUT IT.
Using the objective:1. Apply lens oil to the objective lens. More oil is better than less oil. 2. Place your glass-bottomed sample in a specimen holder. You must ensure that the specimen glass has been wiped clean of salt crystals using dH2O and a Kim wipe. Salt crystals can scratch the objective lens just like Kim wipes! 3. Very SLOWLY bring the objective into contact with the specimen. 4. Look through the specimen to watch when the lens oil surface tension is broken by the specimen. 5. Use only the FINE FOCUS knob while looking through the eyepieces to focus your specimen. DO NOT USE THE COARSE FOCUS KNOB ONCE THE OIL MAKES CONTACT WITH THE SPECIMEN. 6. If your experimental protocol requires that you use a 10X, 20X and 63X objective on the same specimen, gently lower the 63X objective and switch to either the 10X or the 20X, then slowly bring the lower magnification focus up to the specimen The 10X Objective should be in Hole #2 and the 20X Objective should be in Hole #6. During this process, your number one task must be to ensure the safety of the 63X objective AS THIS COSTS AROUND $3000 TO REPAIR EVERY TIME IT GETS DAMAGED!!!. Check the location of the 63X objective after every repositioning of the 10X or 20X objective to ensure it is not contacting the stage. 7. If you wish to use the 5X or the 40X objectives, you must remove the 63X objective entirely. 8. During the use of the 63X objective, the center turret position must be on the 63X, the 10X or the 20X (the immediate right and left of the 63X turret position). 9. DO NOT CHANGE THE POSITION OF THE 10X, 20X, OR 63X OBJECTIVES BEFORE TALKING TO PHIL. They will be numbered and labeled to correspond with a specific turret position. The 63X belongs in position #1, the 10X in position #2 and the 20X in position #6
Objective removal: Objective removal is the reverse of insertion. 1. Slowly lower the objective and remove the specimen. 2. Perform steps 3-6 over the Styrofoam box. 3. Unscrew the objective and screw it securely into the lid of he objective case. 4. Recap the turret hole immediately. 5. Using a cotton tip applicator (NOT A KIM WIPE) to remove oil from the objective. 6. Place the objective into the objective case by screwing the objective case lid into the objective case. 7. Store the objective in the objective drawer in computer desk located in the main laboratory (not the imaging computer desk).
8. Sign the objective
out
Microscope MaintenanceThe microscope is serviced by WEL Instrument (ph: 724-625-9041; fax: 724-625-9069), which operates out of Mars, PA. The cost of a service call is around $250 (cheap!), so don't hesitate to call if there is a problem. Also, we should make a habit of scheduling an annual optical cleaning and tuneup.
Fluorescent FiltersThe microscope is equipped with fluorescent filters that permit a narrow band of excitation to pass through on its way in and allow out a different band of emitted light. See the drawing below (created with the Wiki!!) Our microscope has slots for five filters, but we only have three installed.
DAPI Filter SpectrumFITC Filter SpectrumTRITC Filter Spectrum |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Soft Lithography
|
Making Wafer Masks A simple way to make wafer masks is by printing them directly to a transparency on a high-resolution printer. Design the mask in a negative sense: portions of the photoresist that are obscured by black ink will not be exposed and will wash away; portions of the photoresist that are exposed to light through a clear mask will be hardened and will form the pattern. Recommended is to use a program capable of generating precise dimensions in its printed output, for example a drafting program. I use TeX and PSTricks to print to an encapsulated postscript (EPS) file. Many people in Shelley Ann |




