Stress Analysis Group 33 Website

Team:



Between the first and second design reviews we made many changes to our project. First and foremost, we concentrated on strengthening our structure. We added many more supports to the base and arm and added an extra boxlike structure that added height and gave support to the arm. Next, we moved the arm forward to allow the servo to be closer to the weight. Despite the extra efforts we put into supporting the arm, it was still twisting to the side of the servo (thought much less). We decided to change the orientation of the servo such that instead of being parallel to the arm and mounted to the side, it was mounted perpendicularly on the front of the arm. Though we had some success lifting the weight two inches in the nights before the review, the night of the review our project was only able to lift the weight a little over an inch. Our main problems at this stage were the following:



After discussing our options, we decided to change the position of the servo back to its original orientation, parallel to the side of the arm. However, after doing some more careful calculations, we moved the servo closer to the weight in order to utilize more of its torque. Because we were afraid that the servo would be unable to lift the weight the full two inches, we attached a counterweight to the mini-arm. We played with the design of the mini-arm and counterweight until we had it in a position that did not allow it to touch the ground when lifting (as this was against the rules) and that caused the force of the counterweight to act as far away from the servo as possible (maximizing the moment it caused). We also spent time adding a few more supports to the arm and tightening all of the screws holding our structure together. Unfortunately it was only at this point that we decided to weigh our project and see if we met the weight requirement of 20 ounces. The mini-arm and counterweight alone weighed 5.7 ounces and our entire project weighed over 27 ounces. We struggled to remove every little piece of our project that was unnecessary. However, we were afraid to remove any supports. We removed the counterweight and attempted to lift the weight without it, but the weight did not move at all. Unfortunately we could not permanently remove the counterweight and save ourselves 5 ounces or so. We reattached the counterweight and weighed the structure. The lightest we could make it without sacrificing its strength was around 26 ounces. At the final design review we lifted the weight twice in 30 seconds, as was required. Our first lift was about four inches and our second lift was about 3 inches.